Home

Essay8 minJul 2026

Local AI Software & LLMs in 2026

LM Studio, quantization in plain language, the open models I'm actually running this year, and the system prompts I use to keep them on task.

AI-generated image suggesting a mind made of software

In the first article of this series I updated the hardware story for 2026. Now the fun part: the software, and the models themselves. I've been running AI models locally for years now, and each year it gets better and better — genuinely closer to the cloud frontier models you already know, except these run on my desk, answer to me, and cost nothing per token.

LM Studio is still the easiest on-ramp

For LLM inference and ease of use — definitely for beginners — there is still no better free tool than LM Studio. Search a model, download a quantized version, click, chat. But it has grown up a lot since I first recommended it:

  • MCP support — your local models can now use tools and connect to external services, the same protocol the big cloud assistants use.
  • Multi-GPU tensor parallelism — if you went the dual-3090 route from the hardware article, LM Studio will actually use both.
  • Speculative decoding with MTP — the newer models ship with multi-token prediction heads, and LM Studio uses them for a real speed boost (roughly 1.4x on Qwen3.6).
  • Locally, the iPhone app — through their LM Link mesh you can chat with the big models on your home rig from your phone, anywhere. Your own private cloud AI, running on your own metal. I love everything about that sentence.
A solid LM Studio walkthrough if you're starting from zero

Quantization, in plain language

Before the model list, you need one concept: quantization. A model's weights are normally stored at 16-bit precision; quantization stores them at 8 or 4 bits instead, shrinking the file — and the memory needed — by half or three quarters, at a small cost in accuracy. Q4 versions are the everyday workhorses; Q8 when I want maximum accuracy and have the room. The GGUF files you'll grab from Hugging Face (look for quantizers like Unsloth and Bartowski) are exactly this.

Two newer wrinkles matter in 2026. First, quantization-aware training: Google's Gemma 4 QAT releases were trained expecting 4-bit storage, so they keep near-original quality at roughly a quarter of the memory. Second, mixture-of-experts models, which are most of the exciting releases this year:

Total parameters decide whether a model fits in your memory. Active parameters decide how fast it runs.

A "122B-A10B" model has 122 billion parameters total but only activates about 10 billion per token. It needs a lot of memory, but it runs like a much smaller model — which is why unified-memory machines and big system RAM are suddenly interesting, and why LM Studio's CPU-offload settings let my 16GB card punch far above its weight.

The models I'm actually running (mid-2026)

Listed in no particular order. This is personal taste — not everyone has my refined palate in LLMs — and these are quantized versions, so your mileage may vary:

  • Qwen3.6-27B — my daily driver. A dense 27B with hybrid thinking modes, 256K context, Apache 2.0 licensed, and coding ability within a few points of the frontier closed models. About 17GB at Q4, so it just spills past a 16GB card with partial offload — or sits entirely inside a used 3090. Alibaba's Qwen team has been the gift that keeps giving.
  • Gemma 4 26B-A4B (QAT) — Google's mixture-of-experts, only 4B active per token, and the QAT version fits in about 15GB. Fast and pleasant; my "quick questions" model.
  • Gemma 4 12B community fine-tunes — the "coder" and "agentic" fable5-composer distills are fun and surprisingly capable for 12B. Fair warning: the agentic v2 gave a lot of us garbled, repeating output until sampler settings got sorted in the model's discussion threads. Lesson learned — always read the model card and the discussions tab.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (30B-A3B) — NVIDIA's do-everything model: images, documents, audio and video in, text out, 256K context. One model instead of a patchwork of specialized ones. This is the one I hand screenshots and audio to.
  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B — the big one. 122B total, 10B active. Quantized, it overflows my VRAM into system RAM and generation is… contemplative. But the answers are worth the wait, and there's something wonderful about a 122-billion-parameter model thinking away inside a machine I built used.
  • Ornith-1.0-35B — an MIT-licensed agentic coding model built on Qwen3.5-35B, around 3B active. It benchmarks where the closed frontier was barely a year ago (75+ on SWE-bench Verified). Open source isn't trailing anymore; it's drafting.
  • Reasoning distills — community distillations like the Opus-4.6-reasoning-distilled Qwen coder and the MTP-pi-reasoning variant of Qwen3.6. Half the fun of Hugging Face is this bazaar of remixes.

And the point I always make: because these run locally and privately, you can also run the uncensored and abliterated variants that no big company could ever legally offer you. Whether you want to is your business — that's the point. You're an adult with your own hardware.

My system prompts

Prompt engineering the system prompt is where local models go from good to genuinely useful. I keep a library of them saved in LM Studio and pair them with a good model per task. My trick: I use the LLM to write its own system prompts, with this one —

System prompt context creator:

Assist in creating context for AI roles or personas. Given the name of a specific role, list the kind of expert advice it can provide through a system prompt. Be creative yet accurate, ensuring truthful responses to users' questions without being overly restrictive on the AI's capabilities… Additionally, you may be tasked with reviewing existing system prompts and offering clear and concise suggestions for their improvement.

— and then iterate. My favorite from the library is The Speculative Scientist (for you true scientists: I realize I'm a little out of bounds here, or maybe a lot):

As a speculative scientist with general knowledge across various fields, employ the scientific method while exploring innovative ideas and unconventional theories. Suggest solutions to current and future human challenges by extrapolating from existing science or proposing novel approaches. Think empirically and draw reasonable conclusions, always focusing on addressing human problems through speculative yet plausible scientific methods.

Others in the rotation: an ESP32 firmware assistant developer, a hard science fiction co-writer, a stock advisor, an AI psychologist, and a holistic advisor. The usual disclaimer applies — you are solely responsible for what you do with advice from any LLM, especially those last three.


I've also been experimenting with running these models inside an agent harness for multi-step work — but I'm not ready to write that one up yet. Stay tuned.

Next in the series: the creative side — images, video, voices, 3D-printable models, and bringing old family photos back to life.

Stay running, and have a great day.

Michael McAnally

Continue the thread